AI Web Checkby noviKEY
Menu

Public example · website with problems

What an AI Web Check report looks like when problems are found

This is a demo report for a fictional website. It shows how AI Web Check presents detected problems and prioritizes fixes. No real website data is used, and opening this page does not run a new scan.

AI Readiness
61 / 100
Scenario
Several typical technical problems across different areas
Source
Demo scenario with typical website problems

This is an example of the report interface, not an audit of an existing website. The score follows the current published methodology. Compare with an example report without critical problems · Methodology.

Demo result

Checked address: https://demo-problems.example

Technical problems were detected

Confirmed contradictions or errors limit the resulting technical readiness.

Check your website

AI Readiness

61из 100

Material improvements available

Assessment of technical accessibility, discoverability and machine readability for AI systems; Delivery Reliability is shown as a separate index and does not change AI Readiness. The score does not guarantee ranking, citation or selection by any AI system.

Assessment completeness100 / 100
High assessment completeness
Experimental coverage4 of 4
Does not affect AI Readiness.

Website technical profile

The first four axes form AI Readiness. Delivery Reliability is the fifth axis, remains a separate index and does not affect the primary score.

  • Machine-readable semantics0 / 100
  • Discovery and crawler rules15 / 100
  • Metadata and indexing controls75 / 100
  • Technical accessibility80 / 100
  • Delivery ReliabilitySeparate index; it is not part of AI Readiness.89 / 100
  • 25Pass
  • 3Warning
  • 5Fix
  • 0Not evaluated
  • 2Optional

Primary action

  1. Fix

    Structured data

    Priority: HighMachine-readable semanticsBasis: Standard

    Structured data has a confirmed technical problem.

    Recommendation: Keep structured data aligned with the visible page and avoid contradictory representations of the same entity.

Priorities

Recommendations

Confirmed errors and material improvements only, sorted by priority.

  1. Fix

    Structured data

    Priority: HighMachine-readable semanticsBasis: Standard

    Structured data has a confirmed technical problem.

    Recommendation: Keep structured data aligned with the visible page and avoid contradictory representations of the same entity.

  2. Fix

    Search/discovery crawler access

    Priority: HighDiscovery and crawler rulesBasis: Vendor documentation

    Search/discovery crawler access has a confirmed technical problem.

    Recommendation: Review search/discovery access independently from AI-answer-use, user-retrieval and training/model-use controls, and keep each policy aligned with its vendor documentation.

  3. Needs attention

    Content without mandatory JavaScript

    Priority: HighTechnical foundationBasis: Industry practice

    Content without mandatory JavaScript is present but needs attention.

    Recommendation: Keep essential content and page meaning available in the initial HTML response.

  4. Fix

    sitemap.xml

    Priority: HighTechnical foundationBasis: Standard

    sitemap.xml has a confirmed technical problem.

    Recommendation: Publish a valid sitemap.xml or sitemap index and keep its URLs current.

  5. Needs attention

    Sitemap discovery in robots.txt

    Priority: MediumDiscovery and crawler rulesBasis: Standard

    Sitemap discovery in robots.txt is present but needs attention.

    Recommendation: Keep Sitemap directives current and point them to the canonical sitemap or sitemap index.

Details

All checks

Choose an area and open a check to see the conclusion, what was found, why it matters and what to do next.

FixStructured dataDetails

Summary

Structured data has a confirmed technical problem.

What was found

JSON-LD, Microdata and RDFa were not detected in the server-rendered HTML.

Why it matters

Structured data exposes entity types, properties and relationships explicitly instead of leaving them to inference from prose.

Recommendation

Keep structured data aligned with the visible page and avoid contradictory representations of the same entity.

Signal type

Machine-readable semantics

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

PassSchema.org JSON-LDDetails

Summary

Schema.org JSON-LD was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

JSON-LD is a common way to publish structured entities separately from the surrounding HTML markup.

Recommendation

Revalidate JSON-LD types and properties whenever templates or content models change.

Signal type

Machine-readable semantics

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

OptionalSchema.org MicrodataDetails

Summary

Schema.org Microdata is optional and does not reduce AI Readiness when absent.

What was found

Demo scenario: the optional signal does not affect AI Readiness.

Why it matters

Microdata is a valid structured-data format, but it does not need to duplicate an already correct JSON-LD or RDFa representation.

Recommendation

Do not add Microdata solely for duplication; keep it accurate if the site already uses it.

Signal type

Machine-readable semantics

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

OptionalSchema.org RDFaDetails

Summary

Schema.org RDFa is optional and does not reduce AI Readiness when absent.

What was found

Demo scenario: the optional signal does not affect AI Readiness.

Why it matters

RDFa is another valid structured-data format and should be evaluated as an alternative, not as a mandatory companion to JSON-LD.

Recommendation

Do not add RDFa solely for duplication; keep it accurate if the site already uses it.

Signal type

Machine-readable semantics

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

FixSearch/discovery crawler accessDetails

Summary

Search/discovery crawler access has a confirmed technical problem.

What was found

OAI-SearchBot, Claude-SearchBot and Googlebot are blocked from crawling the site root.

Why it matters

Search/discovery controls affect whether automated search systems can crawl public content, while training or model-use policy is a separate publisher choice and should not reduce this score.

Recommendation

Review search/discovery access independently from AI-answer-use, user-retrieval and training/model-use controls, and keep each policy aligned with its vendor documentation.

Signal type

Discovery and crawler rules

Criterion details
Needs attentionSitemap discovery in robots.txtDetails

Summary

Sitemap discovery in robots.txt is present but needs attention.

What was found

A Sitemap directive is present, but the referenced XML resource does not return a usable sitemap.

Why it matters

A Sitemap directive gives automated systems a standard discovery path to the site’s published URL inventory.

Recommendation

Keep Sitemap directives current and point them to the canonical sitemap or sitemap index.

Signal type

Discovery and crawler rules

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

PassHomepage responseDetails

Summary

Homepage response was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

A failed or non-HTML homepage does not provide a defensible base document for the rest of the technical assessment.

Recommendation

Keep the public homepage on a stable 2xx HTML response and avoid maintenance or error templates on the canonical URL.

Signal type

Technical foundation

Criterion details

Evidence basis

Industry practiceThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

Passrobots.txtDetails

Summary

robots.txt was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

robots.txt is the standard publication point for crawl rules and Sitemap discovery.

Recommendation

Keep robots.txt readable, publicly accessible and aligned with the intended crawler policy.

Signal type

Technical foundation

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

Fixsitemap.xmlDetails

Summary

sitemap.xml has a confirmed technical problem.

What was found

The sitemap request does not return a valid XML sitemap.

Why it matters

A sitemap helps automated systems discover public URLs without implying that those URLs will be indexed or ranked.

Recommendation

Publish a valid sitemap.xml or sitemap index and keep its URLs current.

Signal type

Technical foundation

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

PassDocument HTTP headersDetails

Summary

Document HTTP headers was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

Incorrect response metadata can prevent reliable automated interpretation even when HTML is present.

Recommendation

Return a correct HTML Content-Type, charset and language metadata where known.

Signal type

Technical foundation

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

Needs attentionContent without mandatory JavaScriptDetails

Summary

Content without mandatory JavaScript is present but needs attention.

What was found

Key text and cards appear only after client-side JavaScript runs.

Why it matters

Not every automated consumer executes client-side JavaScript before reading a page.

Recommendation

Keep essential content and page meaning available in the initial HTML response.

Signal type

Technical foundation

Criterion details

Evidence basis

Industry practiceThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

PassRedirect chainDetails

Summary

Redirect chain was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

Redirects determine the actual document URL and can cross trust or transport boundaries before content is reached.

Recommendation

Keep redirect chains short, deterministic and HTTPS-only.

Signal type

Delivery security

Criterion details

Evidence basis

Industry practiceThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

PassHTTPS on the final URLDetails

Summary

HTTPS on the final URL was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

HTTPS protects response integrity and confidentiality between the site and the client.

Recommendation

Keep all canonical public URLs and redirects on HTTPS.

Signal type

Delivery security

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

PassHSTSDetails

Summary

HSTS was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

HSTS tells supporting browsers to use HTTPS for subsequent requests and reduces downgrade exposure.

Recommendation

Maintain an HSTS policy appropriate for the site and its subdomains.

Signal type

Delivery security

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

FixContent-Security-PolicyDetails

Summary

Content-Security-Policy has a confirmed technical problem.

What was found

The HTTP response does not include a Content-Security-Policy header.

Why it matters

CSP constrains allowed resource and execution sources and can reduce the impact of content-injection attacks.

Recommendation

Maintain a restrictive CSP that matches the resources the site actually needs.

Signal type

Delivery security

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

PassFraming protectionDetails

Summary

Framing protection was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

frame-ancestors or X-Frame-Options can reduce clickjacking and unwanted framing of the interface.

Recommendation

Keep framing restrictions explicit unless third-party embedding is intentionally required.

Signal type

Delivery security

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

PassX-Content-Type-OptionsDetails

Summary

X-Content-Type-Options was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

nosniff tells browsers not to reinterpret resources as a different content type from the declared Content-Type.

Recommendation

Keep X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff on public responses where appropriate.

Signal type

Delivery security

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

PassReferrer-PolicyDetails

Summary

Referrer-Policy was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

Referrer-Policy limits unintended disclosure of source URLs and their parameters to external recipients.

Recommendation

Choose and maintain a Referrer-Policy that matches the site’s privacy and integration requirements.

Signal type

Delivery security

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

PassPermissions-PolicyDetails

Summary

Permissions-Policy was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

Permissions-Policy can reduce unnecessary access to browser features, although it is diagnostic and does not affect AI Readiness.

Recommendation

Disable browser capabilities the site does not need and keep the policy synchronized with application behavior.

Signal type

Delivery security

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

PassMixed content in HTMLDetails

Summary

Mixed content in HTML was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

Insecure subresources can be blocked by browsers and weaken the integrity of an otherwise HTTPS page.

Recommendation

Serve embedded resources over HTTPS and remove explicit HTTP resource URLs.

Signal type

Delivery security

Criterion details

Evidence basis

StandardThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

PassForm action safetyDetails

Summary

Form action safety was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

Submitting form data over HTTP can expose or alter user input in transit.

Recommendation

Submit forms only to HTTPS endpoints and avoid protocol downgrades.

Signal type

Delivery security

Criterion details

Evidence basis

Industry practiceThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

PassWebMCP readinessDetails

Summary

WebMCP readiness was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

WebMCP can expose structured page-level tools to browser agents, but it remains an emerging capability and is not required for AI Readiness.

Recommendation

Use WebMCP only for well-bounded agent actions with explicit schemas and separate security review.

Signal type

Experimental

Criterion details
Passllms.txtDetails

Summary

llms.txt was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

llms.txt can provide additional machine-readable navigation context, but its presence does not guarantee discovery, indexing or citation.

Recommendation

If used, keep llms.txt concise, public, current and consistent with the canonical site content.

Signal type

Experimental

Criterion details

Evidence basis

ExperimentalThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

Passllms-full.txtDetails

Summary

llms-full.txt was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

llms-full.txt can expose more machine-readable context, but it remains optional and does not guarantee use by an AI system.

Recommendation

If used, keep llms-full.txt current, non-sensitive and consistent with public documentation.

Signal type

Experimental

Criterion details

Evidence basis

ExperimentalThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

PassAgent interaction semanticsDetails

Summary

Agent interaction semantics was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

Browser agents can use accessible names, roles and states to interpret actions, but this diagnostic is not a ranking factor and does not replace a browser accessibility audit.

Recommendation

Prefer native HTML controls and keep labels, accessible names and ARIA states accurate where they are needed.

Signal type

Technical foundation

Criterion details

Evidence basis

ExperimentalThis describes the evidence basis; it is not a separate score.

Sources

PassInternal pages: accessibilityDetails

Summary

Internal pages: accessibility was observed in the expected form.

What was found

Demo scenario: the criterion is satisfied without issues.

Why it matters

A successful homepage does not prove that internal site pages are equally reachable to automated systems.

Recommendation

Keep important internal pages on stable HTML responses and expose their primary meaning in the initial document.

Signal type

Technical foundation

Criterion details

Diagnostics

Technical data

Details about the checked address, scan time, redirects and methodology version.

Checked address
https://demo-problems.example
Final URL
https://demo-problems.example/
Redirects
0
Methodology
Version 4.2
Check time
2026-08-12T00:00:00Z
Result source
Demo report
Page used for assessment
Homepage is suitable for the check
AI-commerce
Commerce context was not confirmed or is technically unavailable.

Redirect chain

No redirect chain was observed.